This is my first post/discussion. I'm a new player and fixer-hobbyist who's trying to resuscitate a '70s Conn Student-grade Martin knock-off OM that may have been made by Matsomoku. I'm looking for some guidance here as the next step after not getting much response to the query at AGF http://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=484657
Neck is off and joint is not the doweled butt joint I expected but a sliding dovetail (or locking dado). Pics -
My goal is to reduce the heel for proper neck angle and leave the dovetail in place while adding a bolt-on conversion for ease of future work. There is already a factory installed bolt at the heel's bottom that they used to hold the heel in place while the glue dried, so with the kit, there'd be 3 bolts total.
My question at this point:
1. How best to modify the tail and/or socket so that they allow the neck to be pulled back once the heel's reduced, while maintaining the design's integrity? So far as I can tell, the tail's part of the neck (true?), so it will not permit the neck to be pulled back without excess tension on everything, and I don't want to force/stress it.
To allow the neck to angle back, it would seem necessary to cut a slot at the top (neck side) of the tail down to the fretboard's bottom that would effectively severe the tail from the neck, but there's got to be a more pro way to handle this issue.
Alternatively, it might work to reduce the thickness of the wide part of the neck-end of the tail by some amount, with a gradual tapering of the reduction to zero at some point on the tail as it approaches the soundhole end. That should allow the neck to rotate back a bit. I can't tell if material would also need to be removed from the slot to allow the needed forward movement of the tail's bottom to avoid stress on the joint from the rotation. The joint would necessarily be a looser fit after that adjustment. Also, modifying the tail to allow the neck to rotate back might mean the fretboard extension rotates up, leading to tension when I try to glue it down.
I don't want to change the scale in any way, or impact the neck alignment the dovetail provides. I can't find anything online about resetting this neck joint, which suggests it wasn't intended to be reset - challenge accepted.
Is there a better way to reset this neck? Am I on the right track? Has anyone here reset a neck with one of these joints? The pictures I find online showing this joint are the ones I posted.
Thanks for any guidance.
Hi Chris. Frequently I find myself respectfully suggesting to folks in situations such as yours that the ax was not intended to have a serviceable neck joint or, in other words be reset in time as need be. With these potential projects any experience gained is useless IME because no one is ever going to pay an appropriate rate.... to have one of these reset.
I know what I would do if I wanted to reset it anyway but you nixed that by specifically writing that you don't want to mess with the alignment provided by the dovetail. That's exactly what I would do, slice off the dove tail, use it to fill in the matching slot on the top and convert the thing to a butt joint, two bolt bolt-on. Keeping the dovetail tenon attached to the neck shaft and fret board extension will actually resist the pulling that you need the bolts to do to change the neck angle after relieving neck cheek material for the proper neck angle.
It's a lousy design and likely intended to avoid any semi-skilled labor at the f*ctory required to properly set a neck angle and left/right alignment. For serviceability if gets an F though.
This can be done, resetting this but IMO the tenon needs to be sliced off and relocated as a plug of sorts on the top.
For anyone else who fancies getting reset experience that will translate into either learned, useful skills or $$$ get an old Harmony off eBay they had proper dovetails and the methods required to reset translate to Martins and any proper dovetail guitar.
Thanks for the reply. I get that it wasn't designed for repeated maintenance. I just hate to give up on original design (even poor design, if, as here, it serves other purposes) without a fight.
It sounds like you're saying the tenon is a structural part of the neck shaft, which was what I feared because it confirms that the joint, unmodified, will create excess resistance once attached following heel adjustment.
I've seen skilled woodworkers do work I didn't think possible, so what I'd hoped to hear was some little-known woodworker method for shaving/cutting or otherwise modifying the tail/socket to allow some room for the neck to be pulled back without resistance from the joint, thereby allowing me to keep the dovetail for sonic/structural/alignment. I know Jeffrey Suits (here and AGF) reset one of these joints a few years ago (he does a lot of saw-off resets, but he actually pulled the neck on a Conn dread) and I wrote him via AGF to see if he managed to keep the joint, or did as you're suggesting, but I've not heard back yet.
I'll give the inquiry a little more time and, if nobody disagrees with your prognosis, I'll likely follow your guidance. The goal is simply to have this guitar up and going, so I'll do what it takes, even if it hurts to kill the joint. Another option is to take what I need from the heel and see if the added resistance (joint uncut) is enough to worry about.
If I cut the tail, I'd like to at least maintain the left/right alignment, even as the bolts wear their holes a bit larger, over time so I also thought about cutting the tail at the neck (to relieve the resistance), while leaving the remainder glued to the fretboard bottom as a stabilizer. I lose any sonic benefit, but that looks like the only downside. This idea is at odds with your "use it as a plug" suggestion, so I'd appreciate any additional input you had on this. Perhaps a couple of unglued dowels to keep things lined up, with the understanding their neck holes may have to be adjusted for additional angle over time??
Thanks again for the reply, Hesh. I'm learning and having fun from the experience.
Your points are well-taken re: the reset and I'm moving in that direction.
Re: Tape - In addition to preventing tool damage to the top, the low-tack blue tape was used to insulate the top/finish, and to provide support for the foil-covered cardboard that provided more insulation and kept the laminate from coming loose due to the use of hot water bags used to remove the neck. I'd read the neck was likely epoxied and that it took upwards of 200 deg to loosen epoxy, so I was concerned the applied heat would loosen the joints holding the lam sides and heel block together. I'm not in a position to put that kind of thing back together if the wheels came off.
While the guitar's interior shows clear epoxy was used in that assembly, the neck and FB extension were held on with some kind of yellow glue, which was nice to see. It came apart fairly easily, but I'm still glad I used excess insulation, just in case.