Tags:
I don't really know if it makes a big difference, apart from the good point that Pierre-Antoine made about the "vintage Fender" 7.25" radius, which causes problems when doing extreme bendings, and sometimes other problems when trying to get the action really low. Most of the electrics I get to play or repair are 9.5" or 12", and the acoustics 16" or 20". I'm supposing that 16" is a good compromise for acoustic instruments, and is the reason that Martin and Taylor (and many others) use it. Concert guitars usually have flat fingerboards and seem more uncomfortable to me to play, but that could be because of my skill level as a player :-)
If I was building a guitar from scratch, I'd use 9.5" for electrics, and 16" for acoustics, as these are the radii that most players I know prefer, and they can all play much better than me, so they must know :-)
Grahame
Tradition, Tradition, etc.
If you are building a fender style electric, things like polepiece staggering may tend to push you towards a tighter radius as well as the players expectations,
If using a gibson style post mounted bridge, you are generally stuck with 12" to match the available bridges unless you start notching the saddles..
I build my acoustics with 16" cause I have that radius block.
Oh, how could I forget the 12" radius as used by Gibson, PRS etc? ..It was late, the red wine was good etc.
Another one of my senior moments :-)
grahame
© 2024 Created by Frank Ford. Powered by